The Conference Programme Committee (CPC) encourages all potential presenters, including but not limited to researchers, practitioners, policy makers from a range of sectors to submit abstracts for papers or presentations that reflect current understanding and advances in any of the thematic areas.

This abstract guide has been prepared to assist authors in preparing abstracts for submission to the World Conference on Drowning Prevention 2025 in Sharm El Sheikh.

We recommend that you use the following section headings to help present the information clearly. It is not required that you follow this exact framework – you may delete headings, or add in other sections, at your discretion.

Approach 1 – Research Based Abstract

This approach could be selected for research in all disciplines. Abstracts can be organised in the following way: a maximum of 350 words for the body of the abstract.

• Title: should be clear, succinct, and accurately describe the work to be presented. There is a 50-word limit on the title during abstract submission. Please no CAPS.
• Background: briefly state the aim or objective, or describe the problem being addressed.
• Methods: describe how the study addressed the objective or problem, and might include study design, study period, methods of data collection or analysis.
• Results: present the findings and summarize any specific results.
• Conclusions: explain the significance of your findings for drowning prevention and outline future implications of the results.

Approach 2 – Policy, Programme or Project Based Abstract

Suited for lessons learned through policy, programme or project implementation. Abstracts can be organised in the following way: a maximum of 350 words for the body of the abstract.

• Title: should be clear, succinct and accurately describe the work to be presented. There is a 50-word limit on the title during abstract submission. Please no CAPS.
• Background: briefly state the purpose or objectives of the policy, programme or project.
• Description: describe key features of the policy, programme, project including setting, key interventions, activities, population and/or participants.
• Lessons learned: present the findings, including any evaluation of lessons learned.
• Conclusions: explain the significance of your findings for drowning prevention and outline future implications of the results.

References

Please use a numerical referencing system to cite key sources at end of relevant sentence. For example, (1). Write references in a list below the abstract. (1) Authors surname, First name, Year, Title, Publication.

Scoring Criteria

The reviewers will use the following criteria to score your submission. These are the key questions for reviewers:

For Research

• Is there a clear background and justified objective?
• Is the method or design appropriate for the objectives?
• Are the results important and clearly presented?
• Are the conclusions supported by the results?
• Is the study original, and does it contribute to the theme?
• Is the study novel, and interesting, would it contribute to a great event?

For Policy, Programme, or Project

• Is there a clear background and justified objective?
• Is the design appropriate for the objectives?
• Are the approaches, interventions clearly presented?
• Are the lessons learned or best practices supported and clearly presented?
• Are the conclusions relevant, feasible, interesting?
• Is the study original, and does it contribute to the theme?
• Is the work original, interesting, would it contribute to a great event?